Prediction of Harriet Dart [110th] vs Laura Siegemund [95th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W L W L L L L
Form
W W L W L L L W L LHead-2-Head: Dart 1 - 1 Siegemund
They have played 5 sets in total, with Dart winning 2 and Siegemund winning 3. The last match between Dart and Siegemund was at the Japan Open Tennis Championships - Osaka, 15-10-2024, First, Hard with Harriet Dart getting the victory 3-6 7-5 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Harriet Dart | 1 |
| Laura Siegemund | 1 |
| Dart | Stats | Siegemund |
|---|---|---|
| 47% (8-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 40% (6-9) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 110 | Ranking | 95 |
| 70 | Highest Rank | 27 |
| 28 | Age | 37 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 5 | Titles | 16 |
| 56% (357-282) | Career Total W/L | 59% (532-366) |
| $1,741,549 | Career Prize Money | $2,948,445 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 7-5 7-5 |
Stats 
Harriet Dart
Player
Laura Siegemund
48%
(
47 of
98)
1st Serve %
74%
(
75 of
101)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
47 of
75)
57%
(
29 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
37 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
101)
100
Total Points Won
99
|
||||
| 6-2 7-5 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Harriet Dart
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
0
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
7
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
77
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 24 | Games Won | 29 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 12 | Total Double Faults | 10 |
| 2:16:36 | Average Match Time | 2:16:36 |
| 55% (87/159) | 1st Serve % | 70% (119/171) |
| 59% (51/87) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (74/119) |
| 49% (35/72) | 2nd Serve Win % | 56% (29/52) |
| 67% (8/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 59% (10/17) |
| 40% (68/171) | Return Points Win % | 46% (73/159) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Harriet Dart vs Laura Siegemund Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Dart 1 - 1 Siegemund
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Dart has won 36.07% of points on their second serve, while Siegemund has won 41.27%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Dart, in recent form, has won 54.05% of their opponent's second serve points, while Siegemund has won 51.72%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.69% and 34.54% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Dart has saved 49.44% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Siegemund has saved 51.43% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Dart has won 44.9% of matches played (W/L 22/ 27), with Siegemund winning 48.94% (W/L 23/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Dart has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 68/ 48), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 44% (W/L 28/ 36). Siegemund has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 339/ 183), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 13/ 13).
- Player level: In the last year, Dart has played most of their matches on the Masters series, winning 42.86% of matches (W/L 6/ 8), where as Siegemund has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 52% of matches (W/L 13/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Dart winning 1 times and Siegemund being victorious 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Dart winning 2 and Siegemund winning 3. The last match between Dart and Siegemund was at the Japan Open Tennis Championships - Osaka, 15-10-2024, First, Hard with Harriet Dart getting the victory 3-6 7-5 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:16:36.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Dart and Siegemund have played a deciding set 1 times, with Dart winning 1 times and Siegemund 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Dart winning 0, and Siegemund 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Dart has played against opponents with an average rank of 208.16 while Siegemund has played against players with an average rank of 181.83.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Dart has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Siegemund has won 38% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Dart has converted 42.86% of breakpoint opportunities, and Siegemund has converted 36.05% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Harriet Dart Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Varvara Gracheva
Player
Harriet Dart
64%
(
49 of
76)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
82
Total Points Won
65
|
6-1 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | n/p | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaqueline Cristian
Player
Harriet Dart
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Harriet Dart
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
3
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
2
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
49%
(
38 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Harriet Dart
Player
Daria Saville
55%
(
58 of
106)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
2
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
7
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
33%
(
16 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
48%
(
51 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
41 of
76)
96
Total Points Won
86
|
2-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Victoria Mboko
Player
Harriet Dart
68%
(
13 of
19)
1st Serve %
71%
(
10 of
14)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
54%
(
7 of
13)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
33%
(
2 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
53%
(
10 of
19)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
18
Total Points Won
15
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Harriet Dart
Player
Louisa Chirico
57%
(
70 of
123)
1st Serve %
62%
(
85 of
137)
8
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
10
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
52 of
85)
49%
(
26 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
19 of
52)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
42%
(
52 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
66 of
137)
137
Total Points Won
123
|
6-7(6) 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Harriet Dart
Player
Emeline Dartron
50%
(
7 of
14)
1st Serve %
65%
(
11 of
17)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
5 of
7)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
12 of
17)
22
Total Points Won
9
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Harriet Dart
Player
Tyra Caterina Grant
71%
(
5 of
7)
1st Serve %
70%
(
7 of
10)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
100%
(
5 of
5)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
50%
(
1 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Rtn Points Won
80%
(
8 of
10)
14
Total Points Won
3
|
3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Harriet Dart
Player
Alina Charaeva
55%
(
46 of
84)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
88)
89
Total Points Won
83
|
2-6 6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Laura Siegemund Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Pigossi
Player
Laura Siegemund
81%
(
62 of
77)
1st Serve %
72%
(
56 of
78)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
34%
(
26 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
78)
91
Total Points Won
64
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Laura Siegemund
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Ana Konjuh
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
42%
(
25 of
59)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kaja Juvan
Player
Laura Siegemund
56%
(
58 of
104)
1st Serve %
73%
(
85 of
116)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
8
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
51 of
85)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
43 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
50 of
116)
111
Total Points Won
109
|
7-5 6-7(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sorana Cirstea
Player
Laura Siegemund
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve %
70%
(
53 of
76)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
30%
(
7 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 0-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cristina Bucsa
Player
Laura Siegemund
77%
(
56 of
73)
1st Serve %
71%
(
57 of
80)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
40 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Yuliia Starodubtseva
74%
(
64 of
87)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
79)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
38 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
79)
83
Total Points Won
83
|
2-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova
Player
Laura Siegemund
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
76%
(
41 of
54)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Qinwen Zheng
80%
(
64 of
80)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
1
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
29 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Hailey Baptiste
74%
(
87 of
118)
1st Serve %
48%
(
59 of
124)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
14
54%
(
47 of
87)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
24 of
65)
33%
(
8 of
24)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
48%
(
57 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
63 of
124)
124
Total Points Won
118
|
4-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Dart vs Siegemund?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Dart Vs Siegemund is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (357/282) | Win/Loss | 59% (532/366) |
| 55% (808/672) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (1189/881) |
| 52% (7045/6429) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (10016/8881) |
| 0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 915 | Aces Total | 427 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 1745 | Total Double Faults | 1622 |
| 1:16:1 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 183.96 | Average Opponent Rank | 123.73 |
| 55% (18207/33194) | 1st Serve % | 70% (23646/33818) |
| 64% (11607/18207) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (14206/23646) |
| 46% (6839/14987) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (4685/10154) |
| 48% (2026/4195) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (2123/4461) |
| 46% (15499/33684) | Return Points Win % | 46% (15775/34092) |
| 56% (352/627) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (524/885) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (2/4) |
| 52% (76/146) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (93/178) |
| 55% (117/213) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (151/281) |
| 83% (353/292) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (511/443) |
| 17% (353/61) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (511/68) |
| 23% (285/66) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (386/88) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
